One recent lawsuit filed in federal court involves a Georgia woman who claims Dupixent caused or worsened her cancer. According to the complaint, she began using the drug in 2019 to treat eczema. About a year later, she was diagnosed with mycosis fungoides, a common form of CTCL, and now requires ongoing cancer treatment.

What the Lawsuits Claim

Across the country, patients are filing claims against Dupixent’s manufacturers, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi. These lawsuits allege the companies:

• Failed to warn patients and doctors about a possible cancer risk
• Did not update safety labels as new information became available
• Allowed continued use of the drug without fully disclosing known risks

Some patients claim they developed CTCL after taking Dupixent, while others say the drug caused their condition to worsen or progress more quickly.

Medical Concerns Continue to Grow

Researchers are continuing to study the possible connection between Dupixent and lymphoma. Some studies and case reports have described patients who developed or experienced worsening CTCL after starting the drug.

At the same time, federal regulators are reviewing safety data. The FDA has identified CTCL as a potential safety signal and is evaluating whether stronger warnings may be needed.

What Is Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma?

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma is a rare cancer that begins in white blood cells and appears on the skin. It can look like common conditions such as eczema, which can delay diagnosis.

Symptoms may include:

• Red or scaly patches
• Persistent itching
• Thickened skin or bumps
• Skin that does not respond to treatment

Because early symptoms often resemble less serious conditions, CTCL can be difficult to recognize right away.

Talk to Beasley Allen About Your Case

Beasley Allen attorneys Ryan Duplechin and Cade Crow are representing individuals who took Dupixent and later developed CTCL or related cancers.

If you or a loved one used Dupixent and were later diagnosed with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, you may have a claim. Our team can review your case at no cost and help you understand your legal options.

The post Dupixent Dangers Drive Growing Cancer Lawsuits appeared first on Beasley Allen.

$2 Million Personal Injury Settlement*

Ken Wilson secured a $2 million settlement in a case involving rear end automobile collision with minor damage.

For more than 45 years, the Beasley Allen Law Firm has been committed to “helping those who need it most.”

Our attorneys are highly experienced in handling complex cases in courtrooms throughout the United States. In some situations, specific details are too intimate to disclose.

We never stop working to bring our clients the justice they rightfully deserve. We can work for you, too. Contact us for a free case evaluation. You pay us nothing if we do not win for you.

*This result was obtained in a non-Alabama case. Beasley Allen does not represent that the same or similar result would be obtained in other cases.

The post $2 Million Personal Injury Settlement* appeared first on Beasley Allen.

This recognition marks the fifth consecutive year Beasley Allen attorneys have been honored by the Southeastern Legal Awards, reflecting the firm’s continued commitment to strong advocacy and client service. It is also the third time a Beasley Allen attorney has been named an Attorney of the Year finalist, highlighting the firm’s consistent presence among leading law firms across the Southeast.

Together, these honors reflect Beasley Allen’s longstanding mission of helping those who need it most and the dedication of attorneys who work every day to achieve meaningful results for individuals and families.

Beasley Allen’s 2026 Honorees

The following Beasley Allen attorneys were recognized in this year’s Southeastern Legal Awards:

• Clay Barnett – Attorney of the Year – Finalist
  This prestigious honor recognizes attorneys who show excellence, integrity, and leadership. Clay Barnett’s nomination reflects his reputation as a trusted advocate for clients and a leader in the legal community.

• Chris Glover – Distinguished Leaders – Winner
  This award recognizes experienced attorneys who lead both in and out of the courtroom. Chris Glover is honored for his leadership, guidance, and work on complex cases.

• Key Lamberth – Most Promising Newcomer – Finalist
  This honor recognizes attorneys early in their careers who show strong skill and potential. Key Lamberth’s nomination reflects his dedication to clients and his growing impact as a lawyer.

• Parker Miller – Best Mentor – Finalist
  The Best Mentor category honors attorneys who invest in helping others succeed. Parker Miller is recognized for his dedication to mentoring younger lawyers and strengthening the firm.

• Davis Vaughn – On the Rise in Alabama – Honoree
  The On the Rise recognition highlights attorneys quickly making a name for themselves in Alabama. Davis Vaughn is honored for his commitment to clients and continued professional growth.

Each recognition reflects exceptional professional achievement, leadership in the legal community, and a strong commitment to client advocacy.

Recognizing Excellence at Every Stage of a Legal Career

The Southeastern Legal Awards celebrate attorneys at all stages of their careers—from emerging leaders to seasoned advocates and mentors.

Being named a Most Promising Newcomer or On the Rise highlights attorneys who are already making an impact early in their careers. Honors such as Distinguished Leader, Best Mentor, and Attorney of the Year recognize lawyers whose influence extends beyond the courtroom through leadership, guidance, and service to others.

Together, these awards demonstrate the depth of experience and talent across Beasley Allen’s legal teams.

The post Five Attorneys Named Southeastern Legal Awards Winners, Finalists appeared first on Beasley Allen.

$1.25 Million Products Liability Settlement*

The firm secured a $1.25 million settlement involving home health equipment.

For more than 45 years, the Beasley Allen Law Firm has been committed to “helping those who need it most.”

Our attorneys are highly experienced in handling complex cases in courtrooms throughout the United States. In some situations, specific details are too intimate to disclose.

We never stop working to bring our clients the justice they rightfully deserve. We can work for you, too. Contact us for a free case evaluation. You pay us nothing if we do not win for you.

*This result was obtained in a non-Alabama case. Beasley Allen does not represent that the same or similar result would be obtained in other cases.

The post $1.25 Million Products Liability Settlement* appeared first on Beasley Allen.

At the same time, new safety incidents involving Boeing aircraft, including a recent electrical scare that grounded a United Airlines Boeing 7879, are renewing public focus on aircraft design, maintenance, and regulatory responsibility.

Air India Flight 171 Crash: What We Know So Far

Air India Flight 171 took off from Ahmedabad, India, heading to London Gatwick, but crashed less than a minute after departure. The Boeing 7878 struck a nearby medical college building, killing nearly everyone onboard and people on the ground. The aircraft was destroyed.

What investigators have confirmed so far:

• The flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder (“black boxes”) were recovered and are being reviewed.
• India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) says both engines lost power shortly after takeoff.
• The preliminary report does not assign blame and follows international aviation safety standards.

As the investigation continues, families of those killed are calling for transparency and accountability. For many, answers are not just about closure—they are about preventing another tragedy like Air India Flight 171.

Questions On Boeing 787 Safety

Concerns over aircraft safety go beyond Air India Flight 171. In April 2026, a United Airlines Boeing 7879 Dreamliner was grounded after passengers and crew reported a strong electrical odor during flight. The plane turned back and landed safely after an emergency call.

United Airlines confirmed the incident involved a maintenance issue, though the exact cause has not been publicly disclosed. The aircraft had been delivered only months earlier.

While the incidents are unrelated, they have increased questions about electrical systems, aircraft reliability, and whether current safety measures go far enough.

Why These Incidents Matter

Commercial aviation depends on strict safety standards, strong oversight, and clear accountability. When crashes or serious inflight emergencies occur, passengers and families deserve honest answers about:

• Aircraft design and manufacturing
• Maintenance and inspection practices
• Regulatory oversight
• Corporate responsibility

Unresolved questions can point to the need for industrywide improvements, not just individual fixes.

Beasley Allen’s Commitment to Aviation Accountability

Beasley Allen has a long history of representing families affected by catastrophic transportation accidents, including aviation disasters. Our attorneys are committed to uncovering the truth, holding responsible parties accountable, and helping families navigate the legal process during an incredibly difficult time.

The investigation into Air India Flight 171 remains ongoing. As regulators continue their work, families and the public are watching closely for findings that could impact aviation safety worldwide. When companies put profits ahead of safety, accountability matters.

Beasley Allen will continue to monitor developments and advocate for transparency, safety, and justice for those affected.

For more Air India updates and recent interviews, click here.

The post Air India Flight 171 Crash: Ongoing Investigation appeared first on Beasley Allen.

This article explains what the settlement means, who may qualify, and what steps matter most.

What Is the Roundup Settlement?

Roundup is a widely used weed killer that contains glyphosate. Thousands of lawsuits claim that longterm exposure to glyphosate may increase the risk of nonHodgkin lymphoma, a cancer that affects the immune system. Monsanto, the maker of Roundup, denies these claims but has agreed to a proposed settlement to avoid years of continued litigation.

If the settlement is approved, Monsanto would fund a compensation program of up to $7.25 billion over 17 to 21 years to resolve current and future claims.

The court has set important dates for people who may be affected:

• Deadline to Opt Out or Object: June 4, 2026
• Fairness Hearing: July 9, 2026

At the fairness hearing, the court will decide whether the settlement is fair, reasonable, and should receive final approval.

Who May Be Included?

You may be affected by this settlement if:

• You were exposed to Roundup or other glyphosatebased weed killers in the United States, and
• You were diagnosed with nonHodgkin lymphoma before March 5, 2026, or
• You meet the exposure requirements and may be diagnosed with NHL in the future

Exposure may include using Roundup at work or at home, mixing or spraying weed killers, or being nearby when someone else applied them. Farmers, landscapers, groundskeepers, and homeowners may all be impacted.

Your Legal Options

The settlement would create a courtsupervised claims program run by an independent administrator. Claims would be reviewed and placed into tiers based on factors like exposure history, age, and cancer type. Each tier has a base payment, with adjustments depending on individual circumstances.

If you are part of the settlement, you have three choices:

• Stay in the settlement and file a claim if eligible
• Opt out and keep the right to file your own lawsuit
• Object and tell the court you disagree with the settlement

Because this proposed Roundup settlement could limit your future legal rights, it’s important to understand your options before any deadlines pass.

Beasley Allen encourages anyone who was exposed to Roundup and later developed—or may develop—nonHodgkin lymphoma to review their rights carefully before deciding how to proceed. Speaking with an experienced attorney can help you understand what this settlement means for you and whether an individual claim may be a better path forward.

The post Proposed Roundup Settlement: What You Need to Know appeared first on Beasley Allen.

$31.25 Million On-the-Job Settlement*

We resolved a third-party liability on-the-job case for a total settlement of $31.25 million.

For more than 45 years, the Beasley Allen Law Firm has been committed to “helping those who need it most.”

Our attorneys are highly experienced in handling complex cases in courtrooms throughout the United States. In some situations, specific details are too intimate to disclose.

We never stop working to bring our clients the justice they rightfully deserve. We can work for you, too. Contact us for a free case evaluation. You pay us nothing if we do not win for you.

*Beasley Allen does not represent that the same or similar result would be obtained in other cases.

The post $31.25 Million On-the-Job Settlement* appeared first on Beasley Allen.

$4.75 Million Personal Injury Settlement*

Ben Locklar secured a $4.75 million personal injury settlement for a client who suffered severe neck injuries that significantly impacted his quality of life and future.

For more than 45 years, the Beasley Allen Law Firm has been committed to “helping those who need it most.”

Our attorneys are highly experienced in handling complex cases in courtrooms throughout the United States. In some situations, specific details are too intimate to disclose.

We never stop working to bring our clients the justice they rightfully deserve. We can work for you, too. Contact us for a free case evaluation. You pay us nothing if we do not win for you.

*This result was obtained in a non-Alabama case. Beasley Allen does not represent that the same or similar result would be obtained in other cases.

The post $4.75 Million Personal Injury Settlement* appeared first on Beasley Allen.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Heather Marie Huggins, David’s wife, who is now seeking answers—and accountability—for a crash that her family says never should have happened. The case names Amazon and the truck driver as defendants and was filed in Broward County Circuit Court.

A Normal Drive Turns Deadly

On May 11, 2025, traffic slowed in the northbound lanes of Interstate 75 in East Ridge, Tennessee—a routine backup on a busy highway. Drivers slowed and stopped as they often do, expecting the flow of traffic behind them to follow.

One truck did not.

A tractortrailer hauling Amazon freight barreled forward at highway speed, never slowing as traffic ahead came to a stop. The impact set off a violent chainreaction crash, slamming multiple vehicles together and igniting fires across the roadway.

David Jeffrey Huggins was one of the drivers caught in the collision. He was driving his Ford F150, obeying traffic laws, when the crash unfolded around him. He was killed at the scene.

Investigators later determined that the truck driver had been driving erratically before the crash and failed to brake, despite clear daylight conditions, dry pavement, and open visibility. The driver has since been criminally indicted on multiple charges, including vehicular homicide.

What began as an everyday drive ended in irreversible loss—one more family changed forever by a crash that didn’t have to happen.

A Broader Look at Amazon’s Delivery System

The crash did not happen in a vacuum. It unfolded within a delivery system built around speed, rigid schedules, and relentless deadlines—one that placed enormous pressure on how freight is moved and who is trusted to move it. Amazon tightly controlled the movement of its shipments, dictating when loads were picked up, how they were routed, and how quickly they were expected to arrive, while relying on trucking companies that were unequipped to operate safely under those demands.

Despite having access to federal safety data, Amazon continued to allow motor carriers with known safety problems to haul its freight. Those warning signs were visible well before this crash, yet the system allowed unsafe trucks to remain on public highways, sharing the road with families just trying to get home.

One of those carriers was Valparaiso Trucking Corp. In the months leading up to the collision, the company accumulated safety violations that revealed ongoing risks. Those risks ultimately became reality on Interstate 75—where routine delivery pressure turned into a violent, lifeending crash.

Why Trucking Lawsuits Matter

Large commercial trucks can weigh up to 80,000 pounds, and when something goes wrong, the results are often catastrophic. This lawsuit seeks to expose how delivery pressure, poor oversight, and unsafe trucking practices can come together—with deadly consequences for everyday drivers. Families sharing the road should not pay the price for corporate delivery shortcuts.

At its core, the lawsuit is about responsibility—who is accountable when decisions made far from the highway put dangerously large trucks on public roads.

Beasley Allen represents families across the country who have lost loved ones in preventable trucking crashes. These cases are not about speed or efficiency; they are about safety, accountability, and protecting lives. When delivery deadlines outweigh human lives, families deserve answers—and when safety failures lead to tragedy, companies must be held responsible.

The post Lawsuit Filed Against Amazon After Fatal I‑75 Truck Crash appeared first on Beasley Allen.

$4.75 Million Auto Products Liability Settlement*

Chris Glover secured a $4.75 million settlement in an auto products liability case.

For more than 45 years, the Beasley Allen Law Firm has been committed to “helping those who need it most.”

Our attorneys are highly experienced in handling complex cases in courtrooms throughout the United States. In some situations, specific details are too intimate to disclose.

We never stop working to bring our clients the justice they rightfully deserve. We can work for you, too. Contact us for a free case evaluation. You pay us nothing if we do not win for you.

*This result was obtained in a non-Alabama case. Beasley Allen does not represent that the same or similar result would be obtained in other cases.

The post $4.75 Million Auto Products Liability Settlement* appeared first on Beasley Allen.