These recoveries stem from a wide range of cases, including product liability, trucking, medical malpractice, third-party on-the-job injury claims, and premises liability. Each outcome represents a client or family whose life was changed by a serious injury or wrongful death and reflects the firm’s ongoing commitment to holding wrongdoers accountable.

A Strong Track Record in HighStakes Cases

The Atlanta office’s recent success reflects a long history of handling complex, high‑stakes litigation. Year after year, the office has secured hundreds of millions of dollars in verdicts and settlements in some of the firm’s most challenging personal injury and product liability cases.

The Atlanta team has played a key role in many major case outcomes, including a $162 million settlement believed to be the largest in Georgia history for a single automobile accident. From significant trucking, medical malpractice, and auto product cases to precedent‑setting verdicts and large settlements, the Atlanta office has repeatedly taken on powerful companies, prepared cases for trial, and delivered results that have made a real difference for injured clients and their families.

Experience That Drives Results

What sets Beasley Allen apart is not just experience, but how that experience is used. The firm focuses on serious personal injury and product liability cases that require careful investigation, strong resources, and longterm commitment. These are not fast or routine claims.

Attorneys prepare every case as if it will go before a jury. That preparation includes working with trusted experts, reviewing important evidence, and addressing key legal and factual issues early. This approach allows the firm to handle complex cases others may turn away—especially those involving catastrophic injuries, wrongful death, or widespread safety failures.

Focused on Clients, Not Corporations

Behind every verdict or settlement is a person or family facing one of the most difficult moments of their lives. The Atlanta office remains focused on representing individuals—not corporations—who have been harmed through no fault of their own.

For more than 45 years, Beasley Allen has been guided by its mission of “helping those who need it most.” That commitment continues to shape the firm’s work today.

If you or a loved one has been seriously injured, Beasley Allen’s Atlanta office is available to review your case.

*These results were obtained in non-Alabama cases. Beasley Allen does not represent that the same or similar result would be obtained in other cases.

*The amount of some verdicts may have been reduced by post-trial settlement, appeal, or remittitur. Some amounts may have been obtained by default judgment. Some verdicts and settlements were obtained in other states besides Alabama. Beasley Allen does not represent that the same or similar results would be obtained in all cases

The post Atlanta Office Secures Over $102 Million in 30 Days* appeared first on Beasley Allen.

$3.55 Million Product Liability Settlement*

Ben Keen secured a $3.55 million product liability settlement.

For more than 45 years, the Beasley Allen Law Firm has been committed to “helping those who need it most.”

Our attorneys are highly experienced in handling complex cases in courtrooms throughout the United States. In some situations, specific details are too intimate to disclose.

We never stop working to bring our clients the justice they rightfully deserve. We can work for you, too. Contact us for a free case evaluation. You pay us nothing if we do not win for you.

*This result was obtained in a non-Alabama case. Beasley Allen does not represent that the same or similar result would be obtained in other cases.

The post $3.55 Million Product Liability Settlement* appeared first on Beasley Allen.

On June 12, 2025, the Londonbound Boeing 7878 Dreamliner crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad, India. The aircraft struck a medical college hostel complex, killing nearly everyone on board and multiple people on the ground. Families across several countries were left grieving sudden and unimaginable losses.

As investigations continue, aviation safety experts, courts, and families are seeking clear answers and accountability.

What We Know So Far About the Air India Flight 171 Crash

India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has released a preliminary report, but officials have emphasized that the investigation is ongoing and that final conclusions have not yet been reached.

Publicly released information confirms:

• The aircraft lost power seconds after takeoff
• Both engines stopped producing thrust
• The crash occurred before the plane reached a safe recovery altitude

Authorities continue to analyze flight data, cockpit recordings, and aircraft systems. Courts in India have also stressed that early findings should not be treated as final and that technical investigations must be left to qualified experts.

For families, this uncertainty has only deepened the need for transparency and independent review.

Why Aviation Accident Investigations Take Time

Aviation accident investigations are complex by design. Unlike car crashes, aviation disasters often involve:

• Aircraft design and manufacturing issues
• Engine and software systems
• Maintenance and inspection records
• Human factors and training
• Regulatory oversight

Investigators must determine what failed, why it failed, and whether the failure was preventable. This process can take months—or longer—but it is critical for both accountability and future passenger safety.

Beasley Allen’s Role Representing Air India Flight 171 Families

Beasley Allen is representing the families of more than 140 victims of the Air India Flight 171 crash, including passengers and individuals who lost their lives on the ground.

The firm’s aviation litigation team is led by Mike Andrews, a nationally recognized aviation attorney and the author of Aviation Litigation & Accident Investigation. Mike has extensive experience handling complex international aviation cases, including representation of families affected by the Boeing 737 MAX 8 disasters.

Beasley Allen attorneys have:

• Met directly with families impacted by the crash
• Conducted onsite investigations
• Worked with aviation engineers and safety experts
• Closely monitored developments in the official investigation

The firm’s focus remains on following the evidence, protecting families’ rights, and ensuring that no responsible party escapes accountability.

The post Air India Flight 171: Ongoing Investigation, Search for Accountability appeared first on Beasley Allen.

The trial was part of the California Judicial Council Coordinated Proceedings (JCCP), a large group of coordinated cases pending in Los Angeles Superior Court. Bellwether trials are designed to test key evidence and legal arguments and often shape the direction of thousands of similar cases across the country.

Beasley Allen lawyers Joseph VanZandt (Co-Lead of the JCCP), Davis Vaughn, Jennifer Emmel, and Soo Seok Yang were on the trial team and played critical roles in trial preparation, handling fact and expert witnesses, law & briefing, and evidentiary matters.

About the Case

The lawsuit was brought on behalf of a young female who alleged that features intentionally designed to increase engagement on social media platforms contributed to significant mental health injuries. According to the claims, these platforms encouraged compulsive use while failing to adequately warn users and parents about the risks.

Alleged harms included:

• Depression and anxiety
• Body dysmorphia
• Suicidal ideation
• Other serious mental and emotional health conditions

These allegations mirror claims made in thousands of cases filed nationwide by families, individuals, and school districts.

Snapchat and TikTok Settle Before Trial

Just days before jury selection started, Snapchat reached a private settlement with the plaintiff. Shortly after that, TikTok also settled right before the trial began. The settlement amounts were not shared, and the jury did not hear evidence against those companies.

The case then moved forward against Meta (Facebook and Instagram) and YouTube. This shows the growing legal pressure on major social media companies over their impact on youth mental health.

The Findings

Meta: Negligence

1. Was Meta negligent – YES
2. Was Meta’s negligence a substantial factor in causing harm to KGM? YES

Failure to Warn

1. Did Meta know design was dangerous? YES
2. Know that users would not realize the danger? YES
3. Did meta fail to warn of danger? YES
4. Would reasonable platform have warned? YES
5. Was Meta’s failure to warn substantial factor in causing harm to KGM? YES

YouTube: Negligence

1. Was YouTube negligent? YES
2. Was YouTube’s negligence a substantial factor in causing harm to KGM? YES

Failure to Warn

1. Did YouTube know design was dangerous? YES
2. Know that users would not realize the danger? YES
3. Did YouTube fail to warn of danger? YES
4. Would reasonable platform have warned? YES
5. Was YouTube’s failure to warn substantial factor in causing harm to KGM? YES

Why This Verdict Matters

This verdict is the first result from a bellwether trial in the social media addiction cases. It shows how juries may react when they hear evidence that social media design choices can harm young users.

Thousands of similar cases are now pending in California state court. More lawsuits are also moving forward in federal court as part of a Multi‑District Litigation (MDL) in Northern California. Future bellwether trials are already scheduled in both the JCCP and MDL for summer of 2026

Our Role in Social Media Addiction Litigation

Beasley Allen continues to actively represent individuals and families harmed by addiction to social media platforms.

Our firm also represents school districts seeking compensation for costs incurred in addressing student mental health challenges tied to excessive social media use, including counseling, intervention programs, and additional staffing needs.

Beasley Allen has a long history of holding powerful corporations accountable when profits are placed ahead of public safety—especially when children are harmed.

*The amount of some verdicts may have been reduced by post-trial settlement, appeal, or remittitur. Some amounts may have been obtained by default judgment. Some verdicts and settlements were obtained in other states besides Alabama. Beasley Allen does not represent that the same or similar results would be obtained in all cases

The post First Social Media Bellwether Trial Ends in $6 Million Verdict* appeared first on Beasley Allen.

The case centered on the preventable death of Terion Walker, a 59-year-old woman who died as a result of medical failures following orthopedic surgery. Beasley Allen attorneys Rob Register and Larry Golston represented Walker’s family throughout the trial, securing a $13.8 million verdict.

From Car Crash to Surgery

On November 28, 2022, Terion Walker was rushed by ambulance to Piedmont Henry Hospital after a serious motor vehicle collision. The crash left her with multiple traumatic injuries, including fractures to her left ankle and left hand.

Two days later, on November 30, orthopedic surgeon Dr. Timothy Ghattas of AtlantaOrtho LLC performed surgery to repair Walker’s ankle and placed her hand in a fiberglass splint. While the surgery addressed the fractures, evidence presented at trial showed Walker faced a significant risk of developing blood clots after surgery.

A Known Risk and a Fatal Outcome

Medical records showed that Ms. Walker’s doctors knew about her high risk of developing dangerous blood clots after surgery and planned to discharge her on blood thinners for 6 weeks or until she was able to walk safely with a walker. She received blood thinners during her hospital stay, and treatment notes referenced continued deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prevention. However, Ms. Walker was discharged on December 5, 2022, without any prescription for blood thinners.

At a follow-up visit one week later, she remained wheelchairbound and was clearly unable to move safely with a walker. On January 2, 2023, Walker returned to the hospital by ambulance with shortness of breath and leg pain and was diagnosed with DVT and bilateral pulmonary emboli. She died four days later.

Her family later filed a medical malpractice and wrongful death lawsuit, alleging that failures to properly assess Ms. Walker and prescribe blood thinner medication for her known clotting risks led to her death.

Why This Case Matters

This case was tried under Georgia’s newer trial rules, which separate fault and damages and can make wrongful death cases more complicated for families seeking justice. It also unfolded as the Georgia Supreme Court considers changes that could limit what families are allowed to recover after losing a loved one.

For Terion Walker’s family, the case was about accountability—not legal technicalities. It shows how changes in the law directly affect real people facing unimaginable loss. Beasley Allen remains committed to standing up for families harmed by medical negligence and holding healthcare providers accountable, even as Georgia’s legal landscape continues to change.

*The amount of some verdicts may have been reduced by post-trial settlement, appeal, or remittitur. Some amounts may have been obtained by default judgment. Some verdicts and settlements were obtained in other states besides Alabama. Beasley Allen does not represent that the same or similar results would be obtained in all cases

The post $13.8 Million Verdict in Clayton County Med Mal Trial* appeared first on Beasley Allen.

Attorneys in Beasley Allen’s Mobile office recently filed a negligence lawsuit on behalf of a minor who was injured while riding a defective go‑kart at a recreational facility. The case shows how dangerous these attractions can be when rides are not properly designed, inspected, or maintained.

How Amusement Park Injuries Happen

When a child is hurt at an amusement park or similar venue, the case often involves negligence. Negligence means the business failed to take reasonable steps to keep people safe.

In these cases, families may claim the park failed to:

• Properly maintain rides or equipment
• Fix known safety problems
• Train or supervise employees
• Enforce safety rules or age and height limits
• Warn families about known risks

Because amusement parks invite the public and make money from visitors, Alabama law generally requires them to keep their property and attractions reasonably safe.

Children Are Treated Differently Under the Law

Injury cases involving children are not handled the same way as cases involving adults. Alabama courts recognize that children do not fully understand danger and may act impulsively—especially in exciting places like amusement parks.

Courts often consider whether the business took steps that were appropriate for children, such as:

• The child’s age, size, and abilities
• Whether the ride was meant for kids
• Whether the danger was predictable
• Whether safety measures were in place

If an attraction is marketed to families or children, the business may be held to a higher safety standard.

Do Liability Waivers Prevent a Lawsuit?

Many amusement parks use liability waivers. These are often signed online, printed on tickets, or included with wristbands. Parks use them to try to avoid responsibility when someone is hurt.

However, liability waivers do not always protect a business—especially when a child is injured.

Under Alabama law, waivers that try to excuse negligence are closely reviewed by courts. While waivers may sometimes apply to adults, they are much harder to enforce against children. Alabama courts are often skeptical that a parent can give up a child’s future right to seek compensation for an injury.

Representing Injured Children and Families

For decades, Beasley Allen has represented injured children and families, holding companies accountable when safety failures cause harm. We understand the unique legal issues involved when minors are injured and are committed to helping families pursue answers, accountability, and justice.

The post Ride Gone Wrong: Case Filed After Amusement Park Injury appeared first on Beasley Allen.

What could not be seen from the outside was the damage taking place within. Despite having a termite protection plan through Terminix, termites have caused serious structural harm across several Archdiocese‑owned properties, and that damage continued to worsen without proper intervention.

The hidden damage led to a legal dispute that was tried through arbitration process where an Arbitration panel awarded $25,878,087.84, including $8.6 million in punitive damages, against Terminix International Company, L.P.

Beasley Allen Law Firm, working with Campbell Law, represented the Archdiocese of Mobile throughout the proceedings. The arbitration involved multiple properties in downtown Mobile and was handled in several phases. After reviewing the evidence, the arbitration panel ruled in favor of the Archdiocese, holding Terminix responsible for the damage.

A Pattern of Failure, Not an Isolated Incident

The case focused on ongoing problems with termite inspections and treatment services. Evidence presented during arbitration showed that termite activity was allowed to continue and worsen across several properties over many years, even though service agreements were in place.

This was not a matter of one missed inspection or a simple mistake. Instead, the arbitration revealed repeated failures that led to serious structural damage. After reviewing the evidence, the arbitration panel determined that these failures were significant enough to support an award of both compensatory and punitive damages.

The punitive damages reflected the seriousness of the conduct and reinforced the importance of accountability in the pest control industry.

Experienced Trial Teams Working Together

The Archdiocese was represented by a Beasley Allen trial team that included Lance Gould, Tyner Helms, Jessi Haynes, and Lauren Miles, with Campbell Law, led by Tom Campbell, serving as colead counsel. Campbell Law is widely known for its experience in termite and pest control litigation, and the two firms worked closely together throughout the arbitration process.

Their collaboration reflects a shared focus on holding large companies accountable when their actions — or failures to act — cause harm to property owners, institutions, and the communities they serve.

What Property Owners Should Do If They Suspect Termite Damage

If you believe your business, church, or commercial property has suffered termite damage — especially while under an active pest control contract — taking the right steps early can make a critical difference:

• Preserve all contracts, inspection reports, and communications
• Obtain an independent termite inspection
• Avoid authorizing major repairs unless absolutely necessary
• Seek legal advice if damage occurred during an active service agreement

These steps can help protect your rights and preserve key evidence.

*The amount of some verdicts may have been reduced by post-trial settlement, appeal, or remittitur. Some amounts may have been obtained by default judgment. Some verdicts and settlements were obtained in other states besides Alabama. Beasley Allen does not represent that the same or similar results would be obtained in all cases

The post Tackling Termites: $25.8 Million Award Against Terminix appeared first on Beasley Allen.

$9 Million Product Liability Settlement*

Ben Baker secured a $9 million settlement in a product liability crashworthiness case.

For more than 45 years, the Beasley Allen Law Firm has been committed to “helping those who need it most.”

Our attorneys are highly experienced in handling complex cases in courtrooms throughout the United States. In some situations, specific details are too intimate to disclose.

We never stop working to bring our clients the justice they rightfully deserve. We can work for you, too. Contact us for a free case evaluation. You pay us nothing if we do not win for you.

*This result was obtained in a non-Alabama case. Beasley Allen does not represent that the same or similar result would be obtained in other cases.

The post $9 Million Product Liability Settlement* appeared first on Beasley Allen.

What Is the FAA Warning About?

The FAA’s directive applies to Boeing 787‑8, 787‑9, and 787‑10 aircraft. Investigators found that water leaks from lavatory faucet control modules could go undetected during flight. In some cases, leaking water can travel beneath the cabin floor and enter electronic equipment bays.

This is concerning because modern aircraft rely heavily on electronic systems for navigation, communication, and flight control. Water intrusion in these areas can lead to the failure of multiple electronic components and, in severe situations, could affect an aircraft’s ability to continue safe flight and landing.

From Inspections to a Permanent Fix

Earlier FAA guidance required airlines to perform repeated inspections under lavatory sinks to check for leaks and take corrective action if problems were found. However, the FAA has now determined inspections alone are not enough.

The updated directive mandates replacing affected faucet control modules with a redesigned part that is not susceptible to leaking. This hardware replacement is intended to permanently eliminate the risk, rather than relying on ongoing monitoring.

Airlines Begin Making Changes

Air India, which operates dozens of Boeing 787 aircraft, has begun modifying its fleet to comply with the FAA’s order. Other airlines operating Dreamliners globally are expected to do the same to meet federal safety requirements.

Neither Boeing nor individual airlines have publicly disclosed full timelines for completion, but compliance with FAA airworthiness directives is mandatory for continued operation.

Water leaks may sound minor, but in commercial aviation they can have serious consequences. Electronic systems are tightly packed and interconnected, meaning a single failure can cascade into larger system issues. The FAA’s action highlights how design defects—if not addressed—can put passengers and crew at risk.

Standing With More Than 140 Families

Beasley Allen is currently representing more than 140 families affected by the Air India Flight 171 tragedy. Our team is working closely with loved ones from around the world who are searching for answers, accountability, and a path forward after an unimaginable loss.

Led by nationally recognized aviation accident attorney Mike Andrews, our aviation team has decades of experience handling complex aviation cases. Just as important, we understand the human side of these cases—the grief, uncertainty, and need for clear information during an incredibly difficult time.

For families who lost someone on Flight 171, every new development matters. Each update reinforces why it’s so important to ask tough questions and demand honest answers. As the investigation continues, Beasley Allen remains committed to advocating for the families we represent and closely monitoring every development

For more Air India updates and recent interviews, click here.

The post FAA Orders Fix for Boeing 787 Water Leak Risk appeared first on Beasley Allen.

$4.5 Million Auto Products Liability Settlement*

Greg Allen and Chris Glover secured a settlement of more than $4.5 million in an auto products liability case.

For more than 45 years, the Beasley Allen Law Firm has been committed to “helping those who need it most.”

Our attorneys are highly experienced in handling complex cases in courtrooms throughout the United States. In some situations, specific details are too intimate to disclose.

We never stop working to bring our clients the justice they rightfully deserve. We can work for you, too. Contact us for a free case evaluation. You pay us nothing if we do not win for you.

*This result was obtained in a non-Alabama case. Beasley Allen does not represent that the same or similar result would be obtained in other cases.

The post $4.5 Million Auto Products Liability Settlement* appeared first on Beasley Allen.